Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- github_exp_9518 [2024/02/13 18:18] – sginoza
+++ github_exp_9518 [2026/02/12 05:44] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 51: / Line 51: @@
 ==== Lessons Learned ====
-  * We only used the rfced label.  Didn't know we needed the other labels added at RFCED.
   * Using Issues to mention global edits and then PRs to implement them once authors agree.
-  * We figured out how to update the header/boilerplate to be Independent Submission in markdown. (See header of the markdown file at https://github.com/rfc-editor/draft-nottingham-avoiding-internet-centralization/blob/rpc-main/draft-nottingham-avoiding-internet-centralization.md).
+  * We experimented with the header and boilerplate material for Independent Stream documents in markdown (See header of the markdown file at https://github.com/rfc-editor/draft-nottingham-avoiding-internet-centralization/blob/rpc-main/draft-nottingham-avoiding-internet-centralization.md).
@@ Line 63: / Line 62: @@
 "I was a little confused as to what and when to approve stuff." \\
 "It wasn't easy to follow because I probably wasn't correctly subscribed to issues."\\
-He indicated that the issues were appropriately sized and that the labels were useful.  Overall, he didn't find the process more efficient than the current mail-based system, though he would like experiment again after discussion with the RPC.  He also noted that "this was a matter of getting used to it.  I don't want to be too harsh on github because I think some of it really is my own incompetence."
+He indicated that the issues were appropriately sized and that the labels were useful.  Overall, he didn't find the process more efficient than the current mail-based system, though he would like to experiment again after discussion with the RPC.  He also noted that "this was a matter of getting used to it.  I don't want to be too harsh on github because I think some of it really is my own incompetence."