Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- github_exp_9366 [2023/07/12 18:07] – created jmahoney
+++ github_exp_9366 [2026/02/12 05:44] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 ====== GitHub AUTH48 experiment: RFC 9366 ======
 ==== High-Level Summary ====
+  * [[https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sipcore-multiple-reasons/]]
+  * Original repo: [[https://github.com/rjsparks/draft-ietf-sipcore-multiple-reasons]]
+  * Based on [[github_experiment_6|"Experiment 6" design]]
+  * Variance from the experiment design:
+    * Markdown rather than RFCXML
 ==== Workflow ====
+See the [[https://github.com/rfc-editor/draft-ietf-sipcore-multiple-reasons/blob/rpc-main/README.md|readme]]
 ==== RPC Lessons Learned ====
+  * Need to improve documentation for which type of edit to make in which format.
+  * Need to add PR checklist to internal procedures.
+  * More communication required to let authors know the status of the document once the content has been approved (e.g., when the document is being converted to RFCXML)
 ==== Author Feedback ====
+  * **Advantages:** Clear and quick communication about the changes and author questions.
+  * **Disadvantages:** None from my perspective
+  * **Was communication clear and easy to follow?** Yes
+  * **Were there any aspects of communication that were challenging?** Only that the process became untransparent after auth48 was complete.
+  * **Were the issues appropriately "sized"?** Yes
+  * **Were the issue labels helpful (e.g., rfced, question, editor-ready)?** Yes
+  * **Did you find the process more efficient than the current email-based process?** Yes