User Tools

Site Tools


github_exp_2021_feedback

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
github_exp_2021_feedback [2021/05/18 21:32] – external edit 127.0.0.1github_exp_2021_feedback [2026/02/12 05:44] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
-===== Feedback from 2020-2021 Experiment: Using GitHub for AUTH48 =====+===== Feedback on Using GitHub for AUTH48: RFC 8829 =====
  
-Please see [[github_auth48_experiment]] for context.+Please see [[github_exp_8829]] for context.
  
-==== Feedback from Justin Uberti (author, RFC 8829) ====+==== Feedback from Justin Uberti (author) ====
  
 <code> <code>
Line 70: Line 70:
 </code> </code>
  
- +==== Feedback from Jean Mahoney (editor during AUTH48) ====
----------------------------------------  +
-==== Feedback from RFC Editor (regarding RFC 8829) ====+
  
 === Lessons Learned === === Lessons Learned ===
Line 82: Line 80:
  
 === High-level thoughts about this round with GitHub === === High-level thoughts about this round with GitHub ===
- 
  
 My biggest surprise - it is not as useful at communicating issues and changes as I thought it would be. One author was unaware of progress, and the AD never received notifications even when he was @mentioned.  I also thought I knew a thing or two about Git and GitHub, but creating a workflow for the rtcweb-wg repo took time. My biggest surprise - it is not as useful at communicating issues and changes as I thought it would be. One author was unaware of progress, and the AD never received notifications even when he was @mentioned.  I also thought I knew a thing or two about Git and GitHub, but creating a workflow for the rtcweb-wg repo took time.
github_exp_2021_feedback.1621373578.txt.gz · Last modified: (external edit)

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki